Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Report on the Prison Litigation Reform Act: What Have the Courts Decided so Far?

Identifieur interne : 000704 ( Istex/Curation ); précédent : 000703; suivant : 000705

Report on the Prison Litigation Reform Act: What Have the Courts Decided so Far?

Auteurs : Barbara Belbot

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:0E721B47DBF047313CB1F0FDA0EF4C15926D81BA

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

The Prison Litigation Reform Act was passed by Congress in 1996. It had a two-fold purpose: reduce the amount of prisoner litigation and curtail the involvement of the federal courts in the operations of state prison systems. Since its passage, the U.S. Supreme Court and numerous lower federal courts have had the opportunity to interpret several of its complicated and controversial provisions. This article looks at what the courts have decided thus far and predicts future court opinions.

Url:
DOI: 10.1177/0032885504268177

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:0E721B47DBF047313CB1F0FDA0EF4C15926D81BA

Curation

No country items

Barbara Belbot
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>University of Houston–Downtown</mods:affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="no comma">University of Houston–Downtown</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Report on the Prison Litigation Reform Act: What Have the Courts Decided so Far?</title>
<author wicri:is="90%">
<name sortKey="Belbot, Barbara" sort="Belbot, Barbara" uniqKey="Belbot B" first="Barbara" last="Belbot">Barbara Belbot</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>University of Houston–Downtown</mods:affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="no comma">University of Houston–Downtown</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:0E721B47DBF047313CB1F0FDA0EF4C15926D81BA</idno>
<date when="2004" year="2004">2004</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1177/0032885504268177</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/0E721B47DBF047313CB1F0FDA0EF4C15926D81BA/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000704</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000704</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000704</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Report on the Prison Litigation Reform Act: What Have the Courts Decided so Far?</title>
<author wicri:is="90%">
<name sortKey="Belbot, Barbara" sort="Belbot, Barbara" uniqKey="Belbot B" first="Barbara" last="Belbot">Barbara Belbot</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>University of Houston–Downtown</mods:affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="no comma">University of Houston–Downtown</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j">The Prison journal (Philadelphia, Pa.)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0032-8855</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1552-7522</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>Sage Publications</publisher>
<pubPlace>Sage CA: Thousand Oaks, CA</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2004-09">2004-09</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">84</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="290">290</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="316">316</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0032-8855</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0032-8855</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Administrative agency</term>
<term>Administrative remedies</term>
<term>Appeals court</term>
<term>Appellate courts</term>
<term>Award fees</term>
<term>Belbot</term>
<term>Belbot report</term>
<term>Bennett</term>
<term>Branham</term>
<term>Chief judge</term>
<term>Civil rights</term>
<term>Civil rights cases</term>
<term>Civil rights lawsuit</term>
<term>Cognizable claim</term>
<term>Collins grant</term>
<term>Compensatory damages</term>
<term>Consent decree</term>
<term>Consent decrees</term>
<term>Constitutional challenge</term>
<term>Constitutional challenges</term>
<term>Constitutional questions</term>
<term>Constitutional right</term>
<term>Constitutional rights</term>
<term>Constitutional violation</term>
<term>Constitutional violations</term>
<term>Correctional</term>
<term>Correctional officials</term>
<term>Corrections today</term>
<term>Court costs</term>
<term>Court orders</term>
<term>Court system</term>
<term>Criminal justice</term>
<term>Cripa</term>
<term>Damages</term>
<term>Decree</term>
<term>District court</term>
<term>District decision</term>
<term>Effective date</term>
<term>Effective death penalty</term>
<term>Emotional injury</term>
<term>Equal protection clause</term>
<term>Excessive force</term>
<term>Exhaustion</term>
<term>Exhaustion requirement</term>
<term>Federal court</term>
<term>Federal court intervention</term>
<term>Federal court involvement</term>
<term>Federal courts</term>
<term>Federal district court</term>
<term>Federal judges</term>
<term>Federal right</term>
<term>Fifth circuit</term>
<term>Filing fees</term>
<term>Final judgment</term>
<term>First amendment rights</term>
<term>First exhaust</term>
<term>Frivolous</term>
<term>Frivolous claims</term>
<term>Frivolous lawsuits</term>
<term>Frivolous litigation</term>
<term>Grievance</term>
<term>Grievance process</term>
<term>Grievance system</term>
<term>Grievance systems</term>
<term>Habeas corpus petitions</term>
<term>Hourly rate</term>
<term>Imminent danger</term>
<term>Indigent prisoners</term>
<term>Initial filing</term>
<term>Inmate</term>
<term>Inmate grievance systems</term>
<term>Inmate lawsuits</term>
<term>Inmate litigation</term>
<term>Institutional reform</term>
<term>Internal grievance systems</term>
<term>Large number</term>
<term>Large percentage</term>
<term>Lawsuit</term>
<term>Litigant prisoners</term>
<term>Litigation</term>
<term>Lodestar figure</term>
<term>Memphis school district</term>
<term>Monetary relief</term>
<term>Money damages</term>
<term>Montgomery county board</term>
<term>More occasions</term>
<term>Multiple assessments</term>
<term>Ninth circuit</term>
<term>Nominal damages</term>
<term>Physical injury</term>
<term>Plra</term>
<term>Plra amendment</term>
<term>Plra provisions</term>
<term>Previous lawsuits</term>
<term>Printing costs</term>
<term>Prison conditions</term>
<term>Prison inspectors</term>
<term>Prison journal</term>
<term>Prison journal september</term>
<term>Prison litigation reform</term>
<term>Prison officials</term>
<term>Prison reform lawsuits</term>
<term>Prisoner</term>
<term>Prisoner lawsuits</term>
<term>Prisoner litigation</term>
<term>Process rights</term>
<term>Prospective relief</term>
<term>Punitive damages</term>
<term>Remedial phase</term>
<term>Review association</term>
<term>Rights cases</term>
<term>Rights claims</term>
<term>Rights lawsuits</term>
<term>Second circuit</term>
<term>September</term>
<term>Seventh circuit</term>
<term>Several courts</term>
<term>Severe restrictions</term>
<term>Significant change</term>
<term>Simultaneous collection</term>
<term>Special masters</term>
<term>State court</term>
<term>State officials</term>
<term>State prison systems</term>
<term>State prisoner population</term>
<term>State prisons</term>
<term>Suffolk county jail</term>
<term>Supreme court</term>
<term>Supreme decision</term>
<term>Tenth circuits</term>
<term>Termination provisions</term>
<term>Third circuit</term>
<term>Tushnet yackle</term>
<term>Unanimous supreme court</term>
<term>Unconstitutional conduct</term>
<term>Various provisions</term>
<term>Vast majority</term>
<term>Yackle</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en">
<term>Administrative agency</term>
<term>Administrative remedies</term>
<term>Appeals court</term>
<term>Appellate courts</term>
<term>Award fees</term>
<term>Belbot</term>
<term>Belbot report</term>
<term>Bennett</term>
<term>Branham</term>
<term>Chief judge</term>
<term>Civil rights</term>
<term>Civil rights cases</term>
<term>Civil rights lawsuit</term>
<term>Cognizable claim</term>
<term>Collins grant</term>
<term>Compensatory damages</term>
<term>Consent decree</term>
<term>Consent decrees</term>
<term>Constitutional challenge</term>
<term>Constitutional challenges</term>
<term>Constitutional questions</term>
<term>Constitutional right</term>
<term>Constitutional rights</term>
<term>Constitutional violation</term>
<term>Constitutional violations</term>
<term>Correctional</term>
<term>Correctional officials</term>
<term>Corrections today</term>
<term>Court costs</term>
<term>Court orders</term>
<term>Court system</term>
<term>Criminal justice</term>
<term>Cripa</term>
<term>Damages</term>
<term>Decree</term>
<term>District court</term>
<term>District decision</term>
<term>Effective date</term>
<term>Effective death penalty</term>
<term>Emotional injury</term>
<term>Equal protection clause</term>
<term>Excessive force</term>
<term>Exhaustion</term>
<term>Exhaustion requirement</term>
<term>Federal court</term>
<term>Federal court intervention</term>
<term>Federal court involvement</term>
<term>Federal courts</term>
<term>Federal district court</term>
<term>Federal judges</term>
<term>Federal right</term>
<term>Fifth circuit</term>
<term>Filing fees</term>
<term>Final judgment</term>
<term>First amendment rights</term>
<term>First exhaust</term>
<term>Frivolous</term>
<term>Frivolous claims</term>
<term>Frivolous lawsuits</term>
<term>Frivolous litigation</term>
<term>Grievance</term>
<term>Grievance process</term>
<term>Grievance system</term>
<term>Grievance systems</term>
<term>Habeas corpus petitions</term>
<term>Hourly rate</term>
<term>Imminent danger</term>
<term>Indigent prisoners</term>
<term>Initial filing</term>
<term>Inmate</term>
<term>Inmate grievance systems</term>
<term>Inmate lawsuits</term>
<term>Inmate litigation</term>
<term>Institutional reform</term>
<term>Internal grievance systems</term>
<term>Large number</term>
<term>Large percentage</term>
<term>Lawsuit</term>
<term>Litigant prisoners</term>
<term>Litigation</term>
<term>Lodestar figure</term>
<term>Memphis school district</term>
<term>Monetary relief</term>
<term>Money damages</term>
<term>Montgomery county board</term>
<term>More occasions</term>
<term>Multiple assessments</term>
<term>Ninth circuit</term>
<term>Nominal damages</term>
<term>Physical injury</term>
<term>Plra</term>
<term>Plra amendment</term>
<term>Plra provisions</term>
<term>Previous lawsuits</term>
<term>Printing costs</term>
<term>Prison conditions</term>
<term>Prison inspectors</term>
<term>Prison journal</term>
<term>Prison journal september</term>
<term>Prison litigation reform</term>
<term>Prison officials</term>
<term>Prison reform lawsuits</term>
<term>Prisoner</term>
<term>Prisoner lawsuits</term>
<term>Prisoner litigation</term>
<term>Process rights</term>
<term>Prospective relief</term>
<term>Punitive damages</term>
<term>Remedial phase</term>
<term>Review association</term>
<term>Rights cases</term>
<term>Rights claims</term>
<term>Rights lawsuits</term>
<term>Second circuit</term>
<term>September</term>
<term>Seventh circuit</term>
<term>Several courts</term>
<term>Severe restrictions</term>
<term>Significant change</term>
<term>Simultaneous collection</term>
<term>Special masters</term>
<term>State court</term>
<term>State officials</term>
<term>State prison systems</term>
<term>State prisoner population</term>
<term>State prisons</term>
<term>Suffolk county jail</term>
<term>Supreme court</term>
<term>Supreme decision</term>
<term>Tenth circuits</term>
<term>Termination provisions</term>
<term>Third circuit</term>
<term>Tushnet yackle</term>
<term>Unanimous supreme court</term>
<term>Unconstitutional conduct</term>
<term>Various provisions</term>
<term>Vast majority</term>
<term>Yackle</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Droits civiques</term>
<term>Dommages et intérêts</term>
<term>Décret</term>
<term>Réforme institutionnelle</term>
<term>Détenu</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The Prison Litigation Reform Act was passed by Congress in 1996. It had a two-fold purpose: reduce the amount of prisoner litigation and curtail the involvement of the federal courts in the operations of state prison systems. Since its passage, the U.S. Supreme Court and numerous lower federal courts have had the opportunity to interpret several of its complicated and controversial provisions. This article looks at what the courts have decided thus far and predicts future court opinions.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000704 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000704 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Istex
   |étape=   Curation
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:0E721B47DBF047313CB1F0FDA0EF4C15926D81BA
   |texte=   Report on the Prison Litigation Reform Act: What Have the Courts Decided so Far?
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022